Thread:Sitb/@comment-43596541-20200202232456

Bon Matin Sitb

I post I since edited generated a very interesting discussion on "admissible content", "speech moderation"  and  "community standards". I wonder if I would  have the time to read the thread I will link below and share how you other Wiki Communities dealt with it ... I am a proponent of having a Page somewhere where they can be discussed  and eventually voted on, preferrably block by block, leaving the most controversial issues to be individually debated in an open and transparent manner by the whole  HC Wiki Community. BTW I had no problem editing my original comment but found that the Admin Team was really going for the lower common denominator in "political correctness", a trend I always find concerning since it tend to siffle debate and quash out of the box thinking needed for Wikis to do quantum leaps in their devlopment.

Thanks for any advice / input / comments on the general "Guidelines", "admissible content" and "language policing" issues ... Especially on the differences between Articles contents, Comments by Contributors & Editors and Discussions. I do think HC Wiki is overdue to have a debate on those issues but will defer to your extensive Wiki expertise as to what could be the best way to handle this within the HC Wiki Community.

Thread that inspired this call for counsel & mentorship: Started as "Vulgar language"

PS I don't want your opinion on my post or how it was handled,  I'm fine with the way it was properly handled, but I also frimly beliecve we should  refrain from catering to oversensitive / intolerant  people in the future) ... I  rather would like to know where we can go from there that would be most beneficial to the HC Wiki  in the long term ... 